essays on brown and white space

find

 

Content Diversity on the Internet May 20, 03:31 AM

Now that Twitter has become a mainstream buzzword, with companies, celebrities and television personalities pontificating on it’s merits or lack thereof, some OG (that’s original gangsta for those without a ghetto degree) Twitter users are remarking that they forgo all other forms of really simple syndication (RSS). What they’re really saying is that we should all move to social websites as a way of getting our Internet fix.

In a perfect world wide web, this is a mirror of our real world. We tend to get our news from our own networks, neighborhoods, workplaces, places of worship and so on. Technically, there’s nothing wrong with that. But in real life, our networks are a subset of the entire world and, as such, aren’t a really good snapshot of just how diverse the world is.

The Internet, while ingenious in its invention, adoption and take over of our means of communication, still lacks a good representation of the world as it is. If it is truly a global connector, we are missing truthful representations of Africa, Central America and the South Pacific. But we don’t even need to go that far to make the case.

What about our own neighborhoods? Besides what’s reported on the local TV news stations and their online representations, I have no idea what goes down in my Los Angeles suburb. And a lot of, shall we say, interesting? things have happened in the pass six months: a SWAT team being deployed to my brother’s classmate’s street, a house fire just up our street, a smashed telephone pole and several break-ins on one of the major side streets. If I have trouble getting information on these events in my community, how can I even begin limiting my news sources to one medium? I would need every source available to even get one side of the story for each of these events.

Which brings us to this: If the story makers aren’t getting their stories out to every possible news source, their stories will never be told, much less heard. Even in a society as “technologically advanced” as the United States of America, it’s difficult to be connected in your neighborhood if you’re not politically active locally, or part of some sort of coalition or business association. And in a supposedly “global community” we are still quite local in our news networks, on and offline.

This isn’t a bad thing; it’s an opportunity. An opportunity for a grassroots movement of individuals and communities each equipped with their own agency and tools to connect each other to online conversation.

Owen (09.05.20, 05:16 PM)

Hello Ann. I was going through and clearing my bookmarks and finding so many dead links. Then I saw yours and thought, I’ll just check in and see if simplyann still is. And, here you are, still. I don’t recall now how we ever connected or how long ago it was, but it was long ago.

Twitter…my limited experience has been that it is being overtaken by people promoting only themselves. Most follow only to be followed or so it seems. How can anyone really “follow” more than say a dozen or even two dozen people?

Boothism (09.05.29, 03:11 PM)

You made some good points. The “digital divide” (I’m really starting to hate this term) extends from net neutrality laws to the types of content being produced to the way we’re able to interact with it. I’ve been looking at a lot of initiatives that emphasis local reporting. Everything from hyperlocal political watchdog blogs like www.abetteroakland.com to j-school projects like http://missionlocal.org/ but even while I’m seeing folks (largely laid off journalists) start to step up and cover their neighborhoods, there’s not a lot of people of color or folks from diverse socioeconomic conditions represented. But check out the Netsquared conference. I was there last week and there are some interesting technologies coming out that could make it a lot easier to diversify the content and the content producers.

Commenting is closed for this article.